When researching Canon’s 16-35mm f/2.8L III there were multiple websites where I encountered statements like “Canon’s 16-35 f/2.8 III is the same as the f/4 version, except bigger and more expensive, so most people should just get the f/4.” I also saw other research that claimed the new f/2.8 III was sharper, but I couldn’t find image
Canon 6D Mark II Rokinon 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II +1 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread ComplainCanon EF 16-35/2.8L II USM เลนส์ที่ผมชอบที่สุด แฉกสวย เที่ยวลุยได้ทุกที่ เลนส์ตัวนี้เป็นเลนส์ตัวแรกที่ผมซื้อมาพร้อมกับกล้อง FullFrame (Canon EOS 5D Mark III) ใช
Review manufacturer specifications and detailed lab measurements for the Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens. a7R V, a7 IV, a7C II, a6700, FE 16-35 II, 70-200 II
Side of the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens. Side of the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens. As you would expect from a lens that costs this much, build quality is excellent, certainly up to the "L" moniker that denotes Canon's premium lenses. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM feels very solid in your hand, even if the outer barrel and
Rmg09.